Democratic Progressive Azad Get together (DPAP) president Ghulam Nabi Azad. ANI
Democratic Progressive Azad Get together (DPAP) president Ghulam Nabi Azad on Monday mentioned that Supreme Courtroom’s verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir constitutionally legitimate is “sad and unfortunate” and that he’s fairly sure that individuals of the area too shared the identical sentiment.
#WATCH | Democratic Progressive Azad Get together (DPAP) President Ghulam Nabi Azad says, “We are disappointed by the Supreme Court verdict…”
Supreme Courtroom upholds abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu & Kashmir constitutionally legitimate pic.twitter.com/BymzEbnLLP
— ANI (@ANI) December 11, 2023
Associated Articles
Addressing the reporters on Monday, he mentioned, “…Supreme Court was our last hope… We are disappointed by the Supreme Court verdict…. But we have to accept it (the verdict).”
He mentioned that with this resolution, the financial system of J&Okay will endure and worth of the land will go up.
He mentioned the locals can even should endure on the job entrance as now everybody from throughout the nation will be capable to apply for the roles right here, that are naturally restricted.
The Supreme Courtroom on Monday upheld the Centre’s resolution to abrogate Article 370, which bestowed a particular standing on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and mentioned steps must be taken to conduct elections to the Meeting by September 30 subsequent yr.
The apex court docket additionally directed that statehood to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir be restored on the earliest.
The apex court docket reserved its verdict within the matter on 5 September after a 16-day listening to.
Throughout the listening to, the highest court docket heard Lawyer Normal R Venkataramani, Solicitor Normal Tushar Mehta, senior advocates Harish Salve, Rakesh Dwivedi, V Giri and others on behalf of the Centre and the intervenors defending the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370.
Senior advocates, together with Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subramanium, Rajeev Dhavan, Zaffar Shah and Dushyant Dave, had argued on behalf of the petitioners.
The attorneys had dwelt on varied points, together with the constitutional validity of the Centre’s resolution to abrogate the provisions of Article 370, the validity of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, which break up the erstwhile state into two Union territories, challenges to the imposition of the governor’s rule in Jammu and Kashmir on June 20, 2018 and the imposition of the president’s rule on December 19, 2018 and its extension on July 3, 2019.
The petitions difficult the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370 and the validity of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 that divided the erstwhile state into the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh had been referred to the Structure bench in 2019.
The arguments within the matter had commenced on 2 August.
With inputs from companies